Misdemeanor fraud in the flags of heredity

Misdemeanor fraud in the flags of heredity
The legal basis for the case: Article 226: -
A penalty of imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years or a fine not exceeding five hundred pounds shall be inflicted on whoever decides in the procedures related to the investigation of death, inheritance, and the necessary will before the competent authority to take false statements about the facts that are wanted to be proven while he is ignorant of their truth or knows that they are incorrect and that when the media is seized on the basis of These sayings.
Whoever uses notifications of death, inheritance, and the obligatory will, seized in the manner indicated in the first paragraph of this article, while he is aware of that, shall be punished with imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years or a fine not exceeding five hundred pounds.
Case documents: - Photocopy of forged inheritance flags, an official copy of the police report in which the forgery was proven by the testimony of witnesses
Competent court: - The misdemeanor court in which the crime occurred in which the accused resides
The financial element in the crime of forging the flags of the heir is to make false statements in the procedures for investigating death and inheritance before the competent authority to control the media based on them
As for the moral element, it is based on the knowledge that statements are incorrect or in ignorance of their realization.
Registration and description of the crime: - It is a misdemeanor as stated in Article 226/1 penalties
Punishment: - Imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years or a fine not exceeding five hundred pounds.
In the first paragraph of Article 226 of the Penal Code, the legislator will punish anyone who decides in procedures related to the investigation of death or inheritance and the obligatory will before the competent authority to take false statements about the facts that are wanted to be proven while he is ignorant of their truth or knows that they are incorrect, And when will the media be seized on the basis of these statements? And while it was stipulated in the second paragraph of that article - to punish everyone who uses notifications of death, inheritance, and the obligatory will, seized in the manner indicated in the first paragraph of this article while he is aware of that - he intended to punish - according to what is clear from the words of the text and his preparatory work - every person, whether He is a person requesting the investigation of death, inheritance and the obligatory will, or was he a witness in that investigation, provided that the incorrect statements were decided by the competent authority itself to take the media and not in front of others, so the impeachment does not extend to what the student or witness says in a preliminary administrative investigation to give Information or what the investigating applicant reports in his request, because this is a lie in the lawsuit when that was so, and the judgment did not reveal whether each of the appellants had actually appeared before the personal status judge who checked the media and decided incorrect statements before him. He is ignorant of their truth or knows that they are not true, or that what was either of them was signed in the investigation request paper or in front of the administration, then the ruling is defective and the cassation must be decided.
(M 226 Punishments, 310 AJ) (Appeal No. 1195 of 45 Q, session 1975/11/16 Q26, p. 692)