List of marital transmissions
Important cautions when editing a list of even trades
1- The husband must sign by writing his full name (not his mouth) in a clear manner with the usual hand writing with it, and to be extra careful, the thumbprint of his right hand can be taken (it should be noted that the finger is free of any insulating, adhesive or otherwise material).
2- The husband must sign each of the list papers, and it is desirable that the list papers be continuous.
3- The movables must be well described - in order to distinguish them from others when in dispute - by mentioning their basic descriptions - from the colors, materials used, size, quality of wood and the manufacturer.
4- It must be taken into account that there is no abrasion, addition or insertion in the core of the list in order not to be challenged, and also should not leave large spaces between lines or the beginning and end of sentences so that it is not a means of fraud in addition.
5- The husband can obtain a copy of the list, signed by the wife, to ensure that the list of movables in the wife's possession is not tampered with.
Is it permissible to suspend the list of movables on a condition?
First of all, we would like to clarify that the list of movables, is nothing but a civil obligation, like all civil obligations, that may be suspended on a null clause or a suspended condition. Thus, we can devise a system to protect the wife and husband under the khulking system.
Which is for the list to suspend on the condition that the wife has no right to request the return of the movables that are established in the list in the event of her request for divorce by khula, and in the event that she asks for divorce by khula after receiving the list, she must return it or return its value to the husband with compensation for the harm he has suffered, and the wife is permissible in every Cases requesting the return of the list, whether the marital status is existing or her nakedness has been separated by the husband's divorce, and her right to request the return of the list of her marital assets is not forfeited in the event that she requests divorce from the husband for any reason other than khula.
The khul` system is unfair to the husband, as it wastes his ownership of the marital movables that he incurs many costs for preparing them, then the wife flees with it to her husband by a court ruling, carrying the furniture of the marital home, which he suffered a lot in preparing, which is not due to the legitimate financial rights that the wife waives.