Damage lawsuit

Damage lawsuit
The legal basis for the case: -
Article 361
Whoever deliberately destroys or destroys immovable or immovable property that he does not own, or renders them unfit for use, or disrupts them in any way, shall be punished with detention for a period not exceeding six months and a fine not exceeding three hundred pounds, or either of these two penalties.
If the act results in financial damage amounting to fifty pounds or more, the penalty shall be imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years and a fine not exceeding five hundred pounds, or one of these two penalties.
The penalty shall be imprisonment for a period not exceeding five years and a fine of not less than one hundred pounds and not exceeding one thousand pounds if the act results in obstruction or suspension of work of a public interest or if it results in putting people's lives, health, or security in danger.
"The maximum limit of the penalties prescribed in Article 361 is doubled if the crime is committed in execution of a terrorist purpose.
 Defining damage: It is rendering the thing unfit for use or disrupting it, and the law did not stipulate the occurrence of damage in a specific way, and the damage is to everything that is fixed or movable except for what is ruled out in another text, and the destruction must be on the property of others, so the owner has to dispose of it as much as possible. He wills, even by destroying it without inflicting any punishment
Destruction is a premeditated crime, and then the crime is not legally established without the availability of the two elements of criminal intent, namely knowledge and will. The accused must know all the legal elements that legally make up the crime, and he knows that this would lead to incrimination, so he must know that it involves destroying fixed money or Movable is not owned by him or owned by others.
 Reconciliation in the crime of destruction: -
 "The victim or his private attorney and his heirs or their special attorney may prove reconciliation with the accused before the Public Prosecution or the court, as the case may be, in the misdemeanors and violations stipulated in Articles 238 (first and second paragraphs), 241 (first and second paragraphs), 242 (first, second and third paragraphs) and 244 (First and second paragraphs), 265, 321 bis, 323 and 323 bis, 323 bis “first”, 324 bis, 336, 340, 341, 342, 354, 358, 360, 361 (first and second paragraphs), 369, 370, 371, 373, 377 (item 9) and 378 items (6, 7, 7, 9) And 379 (Section 4) of the Penal Code, and in other cases provided for by law
The accused or his attorney may prove the composition referred to in the previous paragraph.
Composition is permissible in any case the case is in, and after the judgment becomes final.
The reconciliation shall result in the termination of the criminal case, even if it was filed by direct prosecution, and the Public Prosecution shall order the suspension of the execution of the punishment if the reconciliation takes place during its execution and the reconciliation has no effect on the rights of the person affected by the crime.